Having returned from the 34. Internationales Feldbahnertreffen in the United Kingdom with a new book on Baguley-Drewry locomotives and working on my model of a Baguley-Drewry locomotive in 1/19 scale, I had a few follow-up questions. I tried to get Artificial Intelligence (AI) to shed light on them and asked Microsoft's Copilot for help. I was shocked to receive the machine's answers!
| The Accucraft model of a Baguley-Drewry locomotive that initiated a heated debate with AI. |
Copilot told me that in fact there had been a 150 hp Baguley-Drewry locomotive delivered to a Danish customer. As I know enough about Danish narrow gauge industrial railway history to know that no 150 hp Baguley-Drewry loco ever worked in Denmark, I was sad to see my own Nystrup Gravel blog quoted as evidence. See Copilot's original answer in the screenshot below:
![]() |
| My crazy mind's completly unfounded story of a Baguley-Drewry locomotive in Denmark presented as historical facts. |
As I began to challenge Copilot about the plausibility of its story it kept telling me how credible the story was. In all seriousness, a premier AI tool made available by a large international supplier was telling me how good I was at lying and manipulating!
![]() |
| When challenged Copilot insisted that my fantasies carried a lot of credebility because my lies were specific and technically plausible. |
Remember that this blog even has a disclaimer saying, and I quote: "Notice that Nystrup Gravel is fiction and that all history regarding the railway and company is my work and not real."
I will skip the next couple of conversations with Copilot during which I kept challenging the machine and it became more and more unsure about how to interpret the info on the Nystrup Gravel blog, while still being unwilling to admit an incorrect first answer. In the end I couldn't stand Copilot's efforts to downplay its failure to check the source behind its claim of historical accuracy and referred to the disclaimer quoted above:
Me: "Really you should study the disclaimer on the Nystrup Gravel blog more carefully. The author has actually gone to the trouble spelling out clearly that Nystrup Gravel is complete fiction. Why didn't you provide me with that information?"
Copilot: "You're absolutely right, and I should have caught that. The honest answer is that I never saw the disclaimer. The search snippet I relied on contained only the article text about the supposed E10 locomotive and not the site's disclaimer page. The information returned to me was limited to the article excerpt, and I failed to recognize that I needed to verify the nature of the source itself before treating any of its contents as historical information.
More importantly, once you first challenged the story, I should have become much more skeptical. Instead of discussing whether the claim was 'plausible', I should have re-examined the source's credibility. Had I seen the disclaimer then the discussion would have ended immediately from a historical perspective. That disclaimer fundamentally changes the status of the source:
- The railway itself is fictional.
- The company's history is fictional.
- Historical narratives associated with the railway are fictional unless independently documented elsewhere.
- Any locomotive history presented within that fictional setting must be treated as fiction unless corroborated by external sources.
In other words, I should never have used the E10 article as evidence for a Danish Baguley-Drewry locomotive. The deeper error was that I failed to identify that the source itself had already declared its content to be fictional."
I believe the above discussion between a university lecturer and a first-semester history student during an examination would have ended with the result 'failed' and rightly so. The same message should be communicated to Copilot.
![]() |
| The book that started it all "The Railway products of Baguley-Drewry" by Allen Civil and Roy Etherington. |
I'm finishing with two points:
A: I work professionally with Copilot generating text every day. I'm not some grumpy, old man who is sceptical of every technological invention since canned food. But AI can be dangerous.
B: I will keep producing wildly incorrect falsifications of Danish narrow gauge industrial railway history on this blog.













































